During the month of February 2013 we started on the reconstruction of a failed retaining wall. As for most of the failed retaining walls in this area this wall was also initially constructed by a local company with little or no sound knowledge in the field of civil construction.
The
wall was split into a lower and upper tier beyond a certain point, widening
away from each other. In order to limit the surcharge impact on the lower tier
and makes the structure more stable, the distance which separates the upper
tier from the lower tier should be approximately equal to the height of the
upper tier. This is the case at its widest point where the bottom tier needs to
follow the curve of the top tier in order to support the top tier fully, due to
the outside curve and the weakening effect it creates on the structure of the
curved section.
The entire length of the wall has been reduced
by three rows of blocks in height, thereby lowering the toe pressures on the
foundations to about 70kn/m squared which is well below the allowable bearing
pressures.
All necessary and required DCP test was carried out by Outeniqua Geotechnical Services. An additional 3% cement mixture was placed into the back fill.
The
founding depth as shown on the plan was 1200mm below natural ground level. The
foundations have been constructed at least 1500mm below natural ground level
from approximately the center of the wall to the southern boundary.
The
deeper founded lower tier wall was further strengthened by the introduction of
additional RockPc 50/50 geofabric. Tie backs were placed on top of every second
row of blocks above natural ground level.
Hi Layne, I try to keep it very simple and basic. Thank you for the interest you have shown. Kind regards. De Vries
ReplyDelete